In this blog post, I will be reflecting on peer reviewing and on my own drafts.
Firstly, these are the links to the peer reviews: Cynthia's and Chloe's.
1. Who reviewed your project three draft?
Good question. I haven't received word yet that anyone has reviewed my paper, although I will keep checking.
2. What did you think or feel about the feedback?
I haven't gotten any feedback from official peer reviewers yet. I'm expecting to hear that my piece doesn't match up with my genre in my blog posts. This would be because it doesn't match. I switched my genre when I had to completely throw out two drafts of my piece because they just weren't working for me.
3. What aspects do you need to work on most? How will you work on these aspects?
I think genre will need to be focused a lot more. I will do this by shortening paragraphs, and possibly adding another section of support. This will also help my argumentation. In addition, I could work on purpose. In my draft, I have my purpose explicitly stated in my conclusion. I'm not sure if this works with my genre, so we'll see.
4. How do you feel about your project now that you've done peer review and conferencing?
My conference resulted in a complete change of topic and genre, so I feel a little shaky. I'll feel better after receiving peer review results (if I ever do). If I don't get any, then I will ask people to look the paper over so I can find strengths and weaknesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment