I learned a lot from reading my own work with an outsider's perspective. My analysis and support seem to be strong, while my structure could use some work. Of course this is not always the case for every bit of analysis, and in some cases my structure is strong. This is just an overall trend I've seen in my writing.
Something I realized is that a lot of things that flow in my head do not flow in the paper. This is something I've always struggled with, and is the reason for my tendency to use transitional phrases. I also realized that explicitly addressing the reader can be awkward in my writing, although I think it is necessary.
![]() |
"Peer Editing" Unknown Author |
I think that the internal structure of my body paragraphs is usually pretty strong, as I outline things ahead of time and address the structure at that point. However, the internal structure of my introductions and conclusions could use some work.
No comments:
Post a Comment